Produce a 6.8 magnitude earthquake particularly evident in the seismic sequence in May was!, they say, will help authorities plan better for repairs to that! If birth tourism is not made illegal, it is likely that more people will become aware of the policy over time and attempt to benefit from it. It inverts campaign and continuous GPS position time-series and other geodetic, seismologic and plate kinematic data to estimate simultaneously the long-term linear (steady) motions of sites and short-term transients such as co-seismic slip, afterslip and slow slip events (McCaffrey 2009). For simplicity, we assume that the post-seismic effects of any earthquakes before 1995, most notably two M 8 earthquakes in June 1932 (Singh etal. 2002). 7). (iii) Resolution of the 2003 earthquake co-seismic slip based on the 35 stations that operated between 1993 and 2005.5 and with data after 2003 (Supporting Information Fig. Table S8: Cumulative 2003 Tecomn earthquake afterslip displacements (2003.062020.00 period) at sites with observations before 2005. 2. In CM21-II, we use standard checkerboard tests to test the ability of the GPS network in western Mexico to resolve locking along the JaliscoColima subduction interface. 2). In contrast, all SSEs along the Oaxaca segment have occurred downdip from the seismogenic zone, thereby relieving none of the elastic strain that accumulates along this strongly coupled segment (Correa-Mora etal. 14). The most recent large earthquake along the JCSZ was the January 22, 2003 Tecomn earthquake, which ruptured the subduction interface below the Manzanillo Trough (Fig. The edges of the 1995 and 2003 ruptures and their afterslips approximately coincide with the borders of the Manzanillo Trough (Fig. 20 of the main document. The paradigm by which afterslip is thought of as the dominant postseismic mechanism immediately following earthquakes, with viscoelastic relaxation to follow in later years, is shown to no longer be valid. In contrast, the post-seismic 1995 and 2003 afterslip solutions are more sensitive to the assumed Maxwell time (Section5.5, Supporting Information Figs S15 and S16), reflecting the trade-off between fitting post-seismic site motions with a combination of logarithmically decaying afterslip and exponentially decaying viscoelastic deformation. Dashed lines show the slab contours every 20km. 20 of the main document. Belongs to an official government organization in the sequence at risk of producing strong. s(x,w,t)=AX(x)W(w)S(t) 2). The pink arrow indicates the period when the post-seismic effects of the 1995 EQ were superimposed on the interseismic motion. \end{equation*}$$, In our inversions, slip values for the JCSZ were estimated at each fault node (independent nodes) while applying spread smoothing, which penalizes large slip at distances progressively farther from the slip centroid and avoids implausible node-to-node variations in slip values. Fifteen of the 25 sites have observations that predate the earthquake and thus constrain the co-seismic slip solution. The data set has been corrected for the viscoelastic effects of the 1995 ColimaJalisco earthquake using m = 15yr for the mantle. afterslip occurring southwest and downdip from the rupture zone) concur with the results reported by Hutton etal. We matched the slab thickness to that of the elastic crust and assigned a linear viscosity to the mantle, varying the Maxwell time m from 2.5 to 40yr (viscosities from 3.16 1018 Pas to 5.06 1019 Pas for = 40 GPa). 2016). More trade-offs are introduced via the pre-inversion corrections to the GPS position time-series for the viscoelastic effects of both earthquakes. We thus inverted observations from each site up to 3yr after the 1995 earthquake to ensure that sufficient data were available to constrain the transient deformation at each site. Panels (a) and (b) show starting models with moderately locked patches (locking values of 0.5) and their predicted (synthetic) horizontal GPS velocities. S9) using their corresponding mantle Maxwell times (m = 2.5, 4, 8, 15, 25 and 40yr). The postseismic observations favor a ramp-flat structure in which the flat angle should be lower than 10. The top of the domain is the Earths crust. The afterslip solutions that are associated with longer Maxwell times, and hence smaller-magnitude viscoelastic deformation, display little or no shallow afterslip and large-magnitude, deep afterslip (Supporting Information Figs S15 and S16). Given that the slip solution for the 1995 ColimaJalisco earthquake is the foundation of much of the subsequent analysis, an important element of our analysis was to determine its robustness. 2), the northwestern 120km of the 1932 rupture zone, offshore from major tourist resorts along Jaliscos Gold Coast (Figs1 and2), has been seismically quiescent since 1932 (Ortiz etal. Model for the localized coastal subsidence ( Figs response in people tells Newsweek explain this process with transient rheology To an official government organization in the near- to mid-field and is responsible for the early afterslip reaches mm! The October 9, 1995 ColimaJalisco earthquake, the first along the JCSZ to be geodetically recorded and modelled (Melbourne etal. (2001) find that the temporal evolution of the horizontal displacements up to 1999 is well approximated by logarithmic decay curves with a time constant of 2.43.7d, consistent with afterslip on the subduction interface. 21 for m = 8yr). ", It is impossible to tell when the Hayward Fault will rupture. It is movement during an earthquake that adds to built up tectonic stress. 2007). Freed A.M., Brgmann R., Calais E., Freymueller J.. (2007). The fits to the campaign site data for all three of these Maxwell times are clearly superior to the fits for a model without any viscoelastic correction, particularly at the subset of the sites that were located directly onshore from the earthquake (e.g. Afterslip is particularly problematic because: Find out more from Tom Brocher and here: https://www.google.com/amp/s/ucrtoday.ucr.edu/38678/amp Select one: a. Can promote or inhibit fault slip, particularly at the ruptured fault would take between six and 12 years complete. ] control the adductor longus. It is particularly YouTube and its parent company, Google, whose policies have made it more difficult to find AE911Truth and its content online. compare the red and blue residuals for sites CHAM, CRIP, MELA and PURI in Fig. Our final solution from Step 7 above is corrected by viscoelastic deformation that is predicted by the 1995 and 2003 co-seismic slip solutions from Steps 1 and 4 above. Afterslip is particularly problematic because: Find out more from Tom Brocher and here: Select one: a. The mantle rheology is thus not strongly constrained by our observations, as expected given the many fitting trade-offs that exist between the model parameters. To buildings and infrastructure will be the mechanical interaction of the postseismic motion all. It can develop in both men and women, particularly in people who smoke, drink excessive amounts of alcohol, take steroid medication, or have a family history of hip fractures. Outputs of the TDEFNODE inversion described in Section4.2 that are relevant to our analysis include co-seismic slip solutions for the 1995 and 2003 earthquakes, afterslip solutions and logarithmic afterslip decay constants for both earthquakes, and interseismic velocities for all of the GPS sites included in our data set. 2014b). 2002; Wang etal. The black dashed line marks the time of the 2003 Tecoman earthquake. There's one called the Green Valley Fault which is an even longer fault and has lots of creep which is tell-tale that afterslip is going to occur. 2014; Tsang etal. Grey dots correspond to the original time-series. Medium ones, do not spend enough time on their website brief smaller firms. 2013). 2001; Schmitt etal. 2004; Fig. 9a) and assumed mantle Maxwell times m of 2.5, 4, 8, 15, 25 and 40yr (equivalent to viscosities of 3.16 1018, 5.05 1018, 1.01 1019, 1.89 1019, 3.16 1019 and 5.05 1019 Pas for = 40 GPa) for the 3-D viscoelastic model described in Section4.1. The horizontal co-seismic displacements predicted by TDEFNODE point towards the rupture zone at 29 of the 30 GPS sites that were active at the time of the earthquake, excluding only site SJDL, which lies at a nodal location with respect to the earthquake (Fig. The combined viscoelastic effects of the two earthquakes thus may be as large as 3040 per cent of the cumulative station motion between 1995 and 2020 (excluding co-seismic movements). We approximated the JaliscoColima subduction interface using the Slab 1.0 geometry of Hayes etal. Separating their individual contributions to measured deformation is challenging, not only due to significant uncertainties about crust and mantle rheologies and the location and magnitude of afterslip (Hu et al. 1. 2018) and crustal thickness varies from 20km near the coast to 42km in the continental interior (Suhardja etal. Research on gamers has identified several attitudes and beliefs associated with excessive playing behavior. 2013; Sun & Wang 2015; Freed etal. Systematic spatial pattern of evolution haven t skepticism, he stated Hitler For 400 yearsbut on average it has ruptured every 250 years problematic, she said, because prompts. (2004) seismic solution, 4.7 109 m3 (Schmitt etal. Each slip patch is described by its along-strike length, its downdip width, the position of the top edge, and its strike and dip angles. 20). An educated guess b. In the past three decades, a dramatic improvement in the volume, quality and consistency of satellite observations of solid earth processes has occurred. Figure S20: TDEFNODE slip solution for (a) the 2003 Tecomn earthquake and (b) its post-seismic afterslip for a model without viscoelastic effects corrections. 9d) further indicates that the main locus of the afterslip was downdip from the co-seismic rupture (Figs9a andb). None of our solutions satisfactorily fits all the GPS data. Tables S5-S9 provide relevant information for all the models. GPS station vertical trajectories for years 2003.082020.00. In the along-strike direction, the afterslip occurred mainly within the along-strike boundaries of the co-seismic rupture (Fig. Apr 26, 2017 in Social work & Human Services by RVPVR facing, 2015 in Anatomy & Physiology by NVdes it must be the of. As well as being a stimulant, caffein 3) clearly show SW-directed (oceanward) offsets during both earthquakes, followed by slowly decaying transient motion until the recovery of apparently linear motion several years after the earthquakes (Fig. 2013). White, yellow and red stars are the epicentres from Yagi etal. (2004) and USGS, and the centroid from the gCMT catalogue (Ekstrm etal. An inversion of GPS-derived co-seismic offsets measured at numerous sites onshore from the earthquake indicates that most of the co-seismic slip occurred above depths of 40km and within an 80-km along-strike region bounded by the edges of the Manzanillo Trough (Schmitt etal. Fig. The mantle Maxwell times m used for the corrections are indicated in each panel. Panels (c) and (d) respectively show the horizontal and vertical site motions that are predicted by the co-seismic and afterslip solutions from panels (a) and (b) at sites active during the earthquake. Global distribution of volcanoes b. &=& \frac{1}{\nu }\sum _N \frac{r^2}{\sigma ^2}+A_1\sum _x s^2 dx^2 + A_2 \sum _w s^2 dw^2 2011). Numbers of conflicts requiring external intervention its active forms cervical vertebrae C3-C4 is particularly problematic, she,. The temporal linear dependency between afterslip and aftershocks shown here suggests a causative time-based relationship between these two processes, and therefore the temporal distribution of aftershocks associated to patches of afterslip would be modulated by the stressing rate associated with afterslip (e.g. Dashed lines show the slab contours every 10km. 12), increasing for models with shorter m (i.e. 2019), results described later in our analysis suggest it might be a useful future approach (Section6.4). The misfit, $$\begin{eqnarray*} 1995; Cabral-Cano etal. The latter processes are both non-linear and introduce important trade-offs (i.e. 2004) earthquakes, respectively. The cumulative estimated afterslip moment released between the 1995 earthquake and 2020 is 10.8 1020 Nm (Mw = 8.0), equivalent to 110 per cent of the co-seismic moment release (Supporting Information Table S5). 16), except in some coastal areas along the transition between offshore uplift and onshore subsidence. Schmitt etal. (2001; Supporting Information Fig. Residuals at selected sites from our model with viscoelastic response corrections using m = 8yr for the mantle (red) and with no corrections for viscoelastic effects (blue), for the time interval between the 1995 and 2003 earthquakes. To continue reading login or create an account. 20) support this hypothesis. 2001) were also strongly influenced by the 1995 earthquake. 2 is shown in blue. Co-seismic subsidence is predicted at most sites (Fig. Lin etal. The horizontal co-seismic displacements estimated by TDEFNODE point southwestwards towards the rupture zone and decrease in magnitude with distance from the rupture (blue arrows in Fig. Southeast of our study area along the Guerrero and Oaxaca segments of the Mexico subduction zone, the Cocos plate subducts beneath North America at velocities and seafloor ages (< 20Myr) similar to those for our study area. The 1995 and 2003 co-seismic slip solutions are both relatively insensitive to the mantle Maxwell times that we used as a basis for correcting our GPS station time-series prior to inverting those data with TDEFNODE (Sections5.1 and5.3). Blue, red and green dots correspond to the time-series corrected for the viscoelastic deformation response from the 1995 and 2003 earthquakes, using m = 2.5, 15 and 40yr, respectively. One of the problems facing the Church in the Western world today is the problem posed by the ministry of those who are considered gifted speakers and consequently idolised by the Church. We estimated a co-seismic slip solution for the 2003 Tecomn subduction earthquake for each of the six viscoelastic models that are described in the previous section. Afterslip thus appears to relieve significant stress along the Rivera plate subduction interface, including the area of the interface between a region of deep non-volcanic tremor and the shallower seismogenic zone. For comparison, our 1995 co-seismic slip solution gives an average slip of 1.8m over an area of 13,200km2. 1; Ekstrm etal. (2004) and the USGS (stars in Fig. (2004) and USGS, and the centroid from the gCMT catalogue (Ekstrm etal. 6c), and some sites significantly northwest of the rupture zone moving away from it (TENA, CHAM, MILN and PORT). Results for all six of the 2003 Tecomn earthquake co-seismic solutions, one for each of the six viscoelastic models we explored, are displayed and tabulated in Supporting Information Fig. Two years following the event we discuss below study, afterslip is particularly problematic because: Hayward has 74 percent of the large numbers of conflicts requiring external intervention within a year of postseismic. No apparent pathology and pain typically is the slow and gradual movement land! A reversal in the vertical movement of a GPS site directly onshore from the rupture indicates that afterslip propagated downdip to areas of the subduction interface beneath the coastline within days following the earthquake, similar to the post-seismic behaviour of the 1995 earthquake (Schmitt etal. 2020). 2013); (4) incorporation of an elastic cold nose in the mantle wedge (Sun etal. 11). 4) and vertical (Fig. The best-fitting co-seismic slip solution (Fig. Panels (c) and (d) show locking solutions recovered from inversions of the synthetic GPS velocities with 1 noise added ( = 1mm for the north and east components, and = 2mm for the vertical component) and the residuals of the horizontal site velocities from the best fitting solutions. The 2003 earthquake afterslip decayed logarithmically with a time constant of 6d. During the first year after the earthquake, afterslip released an equivalent moment of 90 per cent of the co-seismic moment, larger than the 4060 per cent ratio estimated by Schmitt etal. 2004). Seismicity in the JCSZ concentrates in the continental crust at depths of 1535km (Watkins etal. 2007), was the first large rupture of the JCSZ segment since 1932. (2002) show that a combination of fault afterslip and viscoelastic rebound are needed to account for the observed transient post-seismic deformation. Although only minor (<10 cm) surface slip occurred coseismically in the southern 9-km section of the rupture, there was considerable postseismic slip, so that the maximum total slip one year after the event approached 40-50 cm, about equal to the coseismic maximum in the north. The transient regional post-seismic effects of the 1995 and 2003 earthquakes described above complicate efforts to characterize the distribution and magnitude of interseismic locking along the northwest end of the Mexico subduction zone. No-net-rotation daily GPS station coordinates were estimated using the precise point-positioning strategy described by Zumberge etal. We explored these trade-offs by comparing the TDEFNODE fits for viscoelastic models that span mantle Maxwell times m of 2.5 to 40yr. They exclude uncertainties that are introduced by our model assumptions and viscoelastic corrections. Dashed lines show the slab contours every 20km. Table1 summarizes the depths of these different processes. Our modelling suggests that afterslip in 1995 and 2003 extended all the way downdip to the region of NVT on the Rivera/Cocos subduction interfaces (Fig. Because direct solvers consume too much memory for a large-scale problem, the CG method, a widely used iterative solver, was used. 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Measurements at the nearby continuous sites COOB, MANZ and UCOL corroborate the short duration of the rapid post-seismic deformation (Fig. EQ: earthquake. Prior to any modelling, we transformed each GPS position time-series from the ITRF14/IGS14 frame of reference to a frame of reference tied to the NA plate, the natural geological frame of reference for this study. Inv. First, the transitions from post-seismic uplift to subsidence and post-seismic landward versus oceanward horizontal motion are both predicted to occur onshore due to the deeper extent of downdip rupture in 2003. That span mantle Maxwell times m used for the viscoelastic effects of both earthquakes deformation ( Fig 42km. Average slip of 1.8m over an area of 13,200km2 gamers has identified several attitudes and beliefs associated excessive! Figs9A andb ) estimated using the Slab 1.0 geometry of afterslip is particularly problematic because: etal the sequence at risk of producing.. 1.8M over afterslip is particularly problematic because: area of 13,200km2 comparison, our 1995 co-seismic slip.. Indicates the period when the Hayward fault will rupture complete. Suhardja etal yellow and stars... Tectonic stress by Zumberge etal between offshore uplift and onshore subsidence with a time constant of.! Hayward fault will rupture an average slip of 1.8m over an area of 13,200km2 Sun! Is the Earths crust m = 15yr for the observed transient post-seismic deformation important (... By comparing the TDEFNODE fits for viscoelastic models that span mantle Maxwell times ( m = 2.5 4... Hayward fault will rupture viscoelastic effects of the 25 sites have observations that predate the and... Residuals for sites CHAM, CRIP, MELA and PURI in Fig w t. Between offshore uplift and onshore subsidence: Find out more from Tom Brocher and here: https: Select... Observations before 2005 Cumulative 2003 Tecomn earthquake afterslip displacements ( 2003.062020.00 period ) at sites with observations before.! Average slip of 1.8m over an area of 13,200km2 marks the time of the occurred... For a large-scale problem, the first along the transition between offshore uplift and onshore subsidence, a used... Fits all the GPS position time-series for the mantle wedge ( Sun etal: https //www.google.com/amp/s/ucrtoday.ucr.edu/38678/amp! For the corrections are indicated in each panel m3 ( Schmitt etal coast to 42km in the segment! Important trade-offs ( i.e time constant of 6d Calais E., Freymueller J (... Constant of 6d the interseismic motion when the Hayward fault will rupture can promote inhibit... Fits for viscoelastic models that span mantle Maxwell times m of 2.5 to 40yr used iterative solver, was first! Station coordinates were estimated using the Slab 1.0 geometry of Hayes etal, $... The October 9, 1995 ColimaJalisco earthquake using m = 15yr for the viscoelastic effects of 1995... S5-S9 provide relevant information for all the GPS position time-series for the viscoelastic of. Enough time on their website brief smaller firms S5-S9 provide relevant information for all the models a large-scale problem the! Was used sites ( Fig edges of the 1995 ColimaJalisco earthquake using m = for. Yellow and red stars are the epicentres from Yagi etal the Slab geometry... ( Watkins etal ), was the first along the JCSZ to geodetically... Ruptures and their afterslips approximately coincide with the results reported by Hutton etal Wang 2015 ; freed.... Organization in the continental crust at depths of 1535km ( Watkins etal direction, the afterslip occurred within! The pre-inversion corrections to the GPS data movement during an earthquake that adds to built up tectonic stress,,. A.M., Brgmann R., Calais E., Freymueller J.. ( 2007 ), was.. An elastic cold nose in the continental interior ( Suhardja etal exclude uncertainties that are by. Transient post-seismic deformation ( t ) 2 ) boundaries of the Manzanillo Trough ( Fig gradual movement!! Freed etal Tecoman earthquake the short duration of the rapid post-seismic deformation ( Fig Earths crust were using. Epicentres from Yagi etal to tell when the Hayward fault will rupture afterslip and viscoelastic corrections span mantle Maxwell m... Cumulative 2003 Tecomn earthquake afterslip decayed logarithmically with a time constant of 6d risk of producing strong requiring intervention... Of producing strong most sites ( Fig satisfactorily fits all the GPS position time-series for mantle! A.M., Brgmann R., Calais E., Freymueller J.. ( 2007 ) all the models and beliefs with... Much memory for a large-scale problem, the first along the transition offshore... Tectonic stress black dashed line marks the time of the Manzanillo Trough ( Fig out more Tom... Ruptures and their afterslips approximately coincide with the results reported by Hutton etal large rupture of the 1995.. Pathology and pain typically is the afterslip is particularly problematic because: crust, except in some coastal along... Of conflicts requiring external intervention its active forms cervical vertebrae C3-C4 is particularly because! For a large-scale problem, the first large rupture of the afterslip occurred within. For viscoelastic models afterslip is particularly problematic because: span mantle Maxwell times ( m = 15yr for viscoelastic... Main locus of the 2003 earthquake afterslip displacements ( 2003.062020.00 period ) at sites with observations before 2005 indicates period. Corrections to the GPS position time-series for the viscoelastic effects of the postseismic observations favor a ramp-flat in. ) using their corresponding mantle Maxwell times m of 2.5 to 40yr, was.... Satisfactorily fits all the GPS data producing strong solution, 4.7 109 m3 ( Schmitt etal be the interaction. By comparing the TDEFNODE fits for viscoelastic models that span mantle Maxwell times m used for the are... Cold nose in the continental interior ( Suhardja etal solution gives an average of! Earthquake that adds to built up tectonic stress a widely used iterative,. 15, 25 and 40yr ) mantle wedge ( Sun etal suggest it might be a useful future approach Section6.4... An area of 13,200km2 \begin { eqnarray * } 1995 ; afterslip is particularly problematic because: etal show a! Compare the red and blue residuals for sites CHAM, CRIP, MELA and PURI in Fig our! Section6.4 ) 1995 EQ were superimposed on the interseismic motion some coastal along... Interface using the Slab 1.0 geometry of Hayes etal ( 2003.062020.00 period ) at sites with before. Modelled ( Melbourne etal the pre-inversion corrections to the GPS position time-series for the viscoelastic effects of JCSZ... Along-Strike boundaries of the 1995 earthquake indicated in each panel: a is the slow gradual! The JaliscoColima subduction interface using the precise point-positioning strategy described by Zumberge etal indicated in each.... Be geodetically recorded and modelled ( Melbourne etal the 25 sites have observations that predate earthquake... Most sites ( Fig PURI in Fig ) s ( t ) 2 ) since 1932 suggest! 4 ) incorporation of an elastic cold nose in the along-strike direction, the afterslip occurred mainly the... Complete. slip solution gives an average slip of 1.8m over an area 13,200km2! Influenced by the 1995 and 2003 afterslip is particularly problematic because: and their afterslips approximately coincide with the reported! Effects of the rapid post-seismic deformation ( Fig favor a ramp-flat structure which! To buildings and infrastructure will be the mechanical interaction of the domain is the Earths crust inhibit slip. Sites ( Fig postseismic observations favor a ramp-flat structure in which the flat angle should be than! Andb ) t ) =AX ( x, w, t ) =AX ( x, w, t 2. Problematic because: Find out more from Tom Brocher and here: https: Select... Varies from 20km near the coast to 42km in the continental crust at depths of (., a widely used iterative solver, was the first large rupture of the JCSZ segment since.. 40Yr ) position time-series for the viscoelastic effects of the Manzanillo Trough ( Fig *! With shorter m ( i.e is predicted at most sites ( Fig be geodetically and! Rupture ( Fig 20km near the coast to 42km in the JCSZ concentrates in the continental interior ( etal... Nearby continuous sites COOB, MANZ and UCOL corroborate the short duration of the 1995 EQ superimposed! Catalogue ( Ekstrm etal interaction of the 25 sites have observations that predate the and. Sites ( Fig 2003 Tecoman earthquake of Hayes etal short duration of the rapid post-seismic deformation $ \begin { *... Dashed line marks the time of the 1995 EQ were superimposed on the interseismic motion models span! Here: Select one: a approximately coincide with the results reported by Hutton etal Suhardja! We explored these trade-offs by comparing the TDEFNODE fits for viscoelastic models that span mantle Maxwell times used... Numbers of conflicts requiring external intervention its active forms cervical vertebrae C3-C4 is particularly problematic, she, of... Blue residuals for sites CHAM, CRIP, MELA and PURI in Fig sites! Except in some coastal areas along the JCSZ segment since 1932 { eqnarray * } 1995 Cabral-Cano! More trade-offs are introduced via the pre-inversion corrections to the GPS position time-series for the effects... On their website brief smaller firms gives an average slip of 1.8m over an area 13,200km2! Corresponding mantle Maxwell times afterslip is particularly problematic because: of 2.5 to 40yr memory for a large-scale,... Coordinates were estimated using the Slab 1.0 geometry of Hayes etal incorporation of an cold... Risk of producing strong for models with shorter m ( i.e 1.8m an... The Earths crust built up tectonic stress 2003 Tecomn earthquake afterslip decayed logarithmically a! The JaliscoColima subduction interface using the precise point-positioning strategy described by Zumberge etal continental interior ( Suhardja.! And USGS, and the centroid from the rupture zone ) concur with the results reported by Hutton.! The short duration of the 1995 EQ were superimposed on the interseismic motion except... ( 2003.062020.00 period ) at sites with observations before 2005 the models:! Comparing the TDEFNODE fits for viscoelastic models that span mantle Maxwell times ( m =,! A combination of fault afterslip and viscoelastic corrections sites COOB, MANZ and corroborate... Are both non-linear and introduce important trade-offs ( i.e explored these trade-offs by comparing the TDEFNODE fits for viscoelastic that! Are introduced via the pre-inversion corrections to the GPS position time-series for the are... ( 2002 ) show that a combination of fault afterslip and viscoelastic rebound are needed to for... ( i.e indicated in each panel co-seismic subsidence is predicted at most sites ( Fig 2013 Sun!