In order to understand the DeShaney v. We hold that it did not. In 1980 a court in Wyoming granted the DeShaneys a divorce. In Whitley v. Albers,475 U.S. 312 (1986), we suggested that a similar state of mind is required to make out a substantive due process claim in the prison setting. Today, the Court purports to be the dispassionate oracle of the law, unmoved by "natural sympathy." Joshua and his mother brought this action under 42 U.S.C. Pp. Respondents are social workers and other local officials who received complaints that petitioner was being abused by his father and had reason to believe that this was the case, but nonetheless did not act to remove petitioner from his father's custody. Victim of repeated attacks by an irresponsible, bullying, cowardly, and intemperate father, and abandoned by respondents, who placed him in a dangerous predicament and who knew or learned what was going on, and yet did essentially nothing except, as the Court revealingly observes, ante at 489 U. S. 193, "dutifully recorded these incidents in [their] files." When, on three separate occasions, emergency room personnel noticed suspicious injuries on Joshua's body, they went to DSS with this information. he moved to Wisconsin where father randy deshaney married again -but second marriage also ended in divorce. of Social Services, 436 U. S. 658 (1978), and its progeny. Of course, the protections of the Due Process Clause, both substantive and procedural, may be triggered when the State, by the affirmative acts of its agents, subjects an involuntarily confined individual to deprivations of liberty which are not among those generally authorized by his confinement. v. Rodriguez, 411 U. S. 1, 411 U. S. 29-39 (1973) (no fundamental right to education). . The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed, 812 F.2d 298 (1987), holding that petitioners had not made out an actionable 1983 claim for two alternative reasons. You're all set! App. Cases from the lower courts also recognize that a State's actions can be decisive in assessing the constitutional significance of subsequent inaction. Ante at 489 U. S. 200 (listing only "incarceration, institutionalization, [and] other similar restraint of personal liberty" in describing relevant "affirmative acts"). Randy then beat and permanently injured Joshua. In the case at hand, it would be appropriate to use a relatively humane interpretation of constitutional protections that supports fundamental justice and recognizes the need for compassion. Finally, in March, 1984, Melody DeShaney, who was divorced from DeShaney and living in Wyoming, received a call from a Winnebago County official who reported that her son was undergoing brain surgery to save his life. Randy DeShaney entered into a voluntary agreement with DSS in which he promised to cooperate with them in accomplishing these goals. While many different people contributed information and advice to this decision, it was up to the people at DSS to make the ultimate decision (subject to the approval of the local government's corporation counsel) whether to disturb the family's current arrangements. I would allow Joshua and his mother the opportunity to show that respondents' failure to help him arose, not out of the sound exercise of professional judgment that we recognized in Youngberg as sufficient to preclude liability, see 457 U.S. at 457 U. S. 322-323, but from the kind of arbitrariness that we have in the past condemned. xml Joshua's Story (pp. Last August, an appeals court in San Francisco ruled that an abused woman who got a restraining order to stop her ex-husband from harassing her could sue the police department because it did nothing to protect her. Because I cannot agree that our Constitution is indifferent to such indifference, I respectfully dissent. After deliberation, state child-welfare officials decided to return Joshua to his father. Brief for Petitioners 24-29. When Randy DeShaney's second wife told the police that he had "hit the boy causing marks and [was] a prime case for child abuse," the police referred her, complaint to DSS. Petitioners contend, however, that even if the Due Process Clause imposes no affirmative obligation on the State to provide the general public with adequate protective services, such a duty may arise out of certain "special relationships" created or assumed by the State with respect to particular individuals. at 457 U. S. 315, 457 U. S. 324 (dicta indicating that the State is also obligated to provide such individuals with "adequate food, shelter, clothing, and medical care"). We now affirm. He died Monday, November 9, 2015 at the age of 36. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Randy then beat and permanently injured Joshua. Because of the posture of this case, we do not know why respondents did not take steps to protect Joshua; the Court, however, tells us that their reason is irrelevant, so long as their inaction was not the product of invidious discrimination. On another visit, his face appeared to have been burned with a cigarette. . Randy DeShaney, father of Joshua DeShaney, spent more time beating his four-year-old son than he did in prison. The Winnebago County Depart-ment of Social Services investigated the claim, but Randy denied the allegations, In order to understand the DeShaney v. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. What is required of us is moral ambition. Ante, this page. He suffered many bruises and head injuries, and he briefly spent time in the temporary custody of the hospital, pursuant to a DSS recommendation. I thus would locate the DeShaneys' claims within the framework of cases like Youngberg and Estelle, and more generally, Boddie and Schneider, by considering the actions that Wisconsin took with respect to Joshua. . Randy has always denied Joshua's injuries, he told the doctor Joshua fell down the stairs. for injuries that could have been averted, Rehnquist concluded in the case (DeShaney vs. Winnebago County, 87-154). Presumably, then, if respondents decided not to help Joshua because his name began with a "J," or because he was born in the spring, or because they did not care enough about him even to formulate an intent to discriminate against him based on an arbitrary reason, respondents would not be liable to the DeShaneys because they were not the ones who dealt the blows that destroyed Joshua's life. In so holding, the court specifically rejected the position endorsed by a divided panel of the Third Circuit in Estate of Bailey by Oare v. County of York, 768 F.2d 503, 510-511 (CA3 1985), and by dicta in Jensen v. Conrad, 747 F.2d 185, 190-194 (CA4 1984), cert. The Department of Social Services (DSS) in Winnebago, Wis., was put on notice of the abuse by DeShaney's second wife and step-mother . Due process is designed to protect individuals from the government rather than from one another. that, because the prisoner is unable "by reason of the deprivation of his liberty [to] care for himself,'" it is only "`just'" that the State be required to care for him. dutifully record these incidents in their files.. The Winnebago County Department of Social Services (DSS) interviewed the father, but he denied the accusations, and DSS did not pursue them further. The father shortly thereafter moved to Neenah, a city located in Winnebago County, Wisconsin, taking the infant Joshua with him. Previous to Randy's current city of Appleton, WI, Randy Deshaney lived in Custer WI and Menasha WI. There he married (and shortly afterward divorced) a woman whose lawyer told the police in 1982 that Randy had "hit the boy, causing marks and is a prime case for child abuse." In January 1983, Randy DeShaney's girlfriend, Marie, brought Joshua to a hospital. The father shortly thereafter moved to Neenah, a city located in Winnebago County, Wisconsin, taking the infant Joshua with him. But theyve hit a snag, Student debt is a crisis: Activists rally outside Supreme Court for loan forgiveness. Matthews, MO 63867 The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that "[n]o State shall . Had the State, by the affirmative exercise of its power, removed Joshua from free society and placed him in a foster home operated by its agents, we might have a situation sufficiently analogous to incarceration or institutionalization to give rise to an affirmative duty to protect. a duty to provide certain services and care does exist"). at 104, compiled growing evidence that Joshua was being abused, that information stayed within the Department -- chronicled by the social worker in detail that seems almost eerie in light of her failure to act upon it. 1983 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin against respondents Winnebago County, DSS, and various individual employees of DSS. of Social Services, 649 F.2d 134, 141-142 (CA2 1981), after remand, 709 F.2d 782, cert. When, on three separate occasions, emergency room personnel noticed suspicious injuries on Joshua's body, they went to DSS with this . Three liberal members of the court--Justices William J. Brennan Jr., Thurgood Marshall and Harry A. Blackmun--strongly dissented. The Fourteenth Amendment does not require the state to intervene in protecting residents from actions of private parties that may infringe on their life, liberty, and property. We express no view on the validity of this analogy, however, as it is not before us in the present case. Barnett, Randy E.: as libertarian conservative 138-39, 140, 143, 244n15. A team was formed to monitor the case and visit the DeShaney home monthly. "the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was intended to prevent government, 'from abusing [its] power, or employing it as an instrument of oppression.'". The suit, which sought money for the childs support, was based on the 14th Amendment, which says that no state may deprive any person of life (or) liberty without due process of law.. Petitioner Joshua DeShaney was born in 1979. Ante, at 192. . Chief Justice Rehnquist's opinion for the 6-3 majority took the narrowest possible view of the facts in holding that the county agency, despite its employees' absolute knowledge of the threat that. denied sub nom. Column: Trump tormentor, whiteboard wizard its the brand that matters in California Senate race, Before and after photos from space show storms effect on California reservoirs, Dramatic before and after photos from space show epic snow blanketing SoCal mountains, The chance of a lifetime: Five friends ski the tallest mountain in Los Angeles, Shocking, impossible gas bills push restaurants to the brink of closures, Review: A reimagined Secret Garden fails to flower anew at the Ahmanson Theatre, Ohios senators to unveil rail safety bill in wake of East Palestine derailment, Newsom gets good marks in new poll but faces test with budget crisis, Chicago Mayor Lightfoot ousted; Vallas, Johnson in runoff, Column: Supreme Court conservatives may want to block student loan forgiveness. But such formalistic reasoning has no place in the interpretation of the broad and stirring Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Such a method is not new to this Court. To make out an Eighth Amendment claim based on the failure to provide adequate medical care, a prisoner must show that the state defendants exhibited "deliberate indifference" to his "serious" medical needs; the mere negligent or inadvertent failure to provide adequate care is not enough. After the divorce of his parents, the custody was given to Randy DeShaney. David G. Savage has covered the Supreme Court and legal issues for the Los Angeles Times in the Washington bureau since 1986. Indeed, I submit that these Clauses were designed, at least in part, to undo the formalistic legal reasoning that infected antebellum jurisprudence, which the late Professor Robert Cover analyzed so effectively in his significant work entitled Justice Accused (1975). Thus, in the Court's view, Youngberg can be explained (and dismissed) in the following way: "In the substantive due process analysis, it is the State's affirmative act of restraining the individual's freedom to act on his own behalf -- through incarceration, institutionalization, or other similar restraint of personal liberty -- which is the 'deprivation of liberty' triggering the protections of the Due Process, Clause, not its failure to act to protect his liberty interests against harms inflicted by other means. The genesis of this notion appears to lie in a statement in our opinion in Martinez v. California, 444 U. S. 277 (1980). Similarly, Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U. S. 1 (1948), and Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, 365 U. S. 715 (1961), suggest that a State may be found complicit in an injury even if it did not create the situation that caused the harm. See Estelle, supra, at 429 U. S. 104 ("[I]t is but just that the public be required to care for the prisoner, who cannot, by reason of the deprivation of his liberty, care for himself"); Youngberg, supra, at 457 U. S. 317 ("When a person is institutionalized -- and wholly dependent on the State -- it is conceded by petitioners that a duty to provide certain services and care does exist"). See, e.g., Harris v. McRae, 448 U. S. 297, 448 U. S. 317-318 (1980) (no obligation to fund abortions or other medical services) (discussing Due Process Clause of Fifth Amendment); Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U. S. 56, 405 U. S. 74 (1972) (no obligation to provide adequate housing) (discussing Due Process Clause of Fourteenth Amendment); see also Youngberg v. Romeo, supra, at 457 U. S. 317 ("As a general matter, a State is under no constitutional duty to provide substantive services for those within its border"). For these purposes, moreover, actual physical restraint is not the only state action that has been considered relevant. The government cannot be held liable for injuries that might not have happened if it had provided certain services if it has no duty to provide those protective services. Taken together, they stand only for the proposition that, when the State takes a person into its custody and holds him there, against his will, the Constitution imposes upon it a corresponding duty to assume some responsibility for his safety and general wellbeing. See Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. at 474 U. S. 335-336; Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. at 451 U. S. 544; Martinez v. California, 444 U. S. 277, 444 U. S. 285 (1980); Baker v. McCollan, 443 U. S. 137, 443 U. S. 146 (1979); Paul v. Davis, 424 U. S. 693, 424 U. S. 701 (1976). at 444 U. S. 285 (footnote omitted). . Respondents, a county department of social services and several of its social workers, received complaints that petitioner was being abused by his father, and took various steps to protect him; they did not, however, act to remove petitioner from his father's custody. JUSTICE BRENNAN, with whom JUSTICE MARSHALL and JUSTICE BLACKMUN join, dissenting. But they set a tone equally well established in precedent as, and contradictory to, the one the Court sets by situating the DeShaneys' complaint within the class of cases epitomized by the Court's decision in Harris v. McRae, 448 U. S. 297 (1980). Cf. Several of the Courts of Appeals have read this language as implying that, once the State learns that a third party poses a special danger to an identified victim, and indicates its willingness to protect the victim against that danger, a "special relationship" arises between State and victim, giving rise to an affirmative duty, enforceable through the Due Process Clause, to render adequate protection. But before yielding to that impulse, it is well to remember once again that the harm was inflicted not by the State of Wisconsin, but by Joshua's father. A state may, through its courts and legislature, impose such affirmative duties and protection upon its agents as it sees fit, he wrote. Petitioners argue that such a "special relationship" existed here because the State knew that Joshua faced a special danger of abuse at his father's hands, and specifically proclaimed, by word and by deed, its intention to protect him against that danger. Opinion for Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Curry First, Esq. Randy DeShaney entered into a voluntary agreement with DSS in which he promised to cooperate with them in accomplishing these goals. 6 ("At relevant times to and until March 8, 1984, [the date of the final beating,] Joshua DeShaney was in the custody and control of Defendant Randy DeShaney"). The caseworker concluded that there was no basis for action. Best Match Powered by Whitepages Premium AGE 60s Randy Wayne Deschene Moorhead, MN Aliases Randy Desehene View Full Report Addresses Clearview Ct, Moorhead, MN at 475 U. S. 326-327. 1983. In March, 1984, Randy DeShaney beat 4-year-old Joshua so severely that he fell into a life-threatening coma. Nor does history support such an expansive reading of the constitutional text. The affirmative duty to protect arises not from the State's knowledge of the individual's predicament or from its expressions of intent to help him, but from the limitation which it has imposed on his freedom to act on his own behalf. It will be meager comfort to Joshua and his mother to know that, if the State had "selectively den[ied] its protective services" to them because they were "disfavored minorities," ante at 489 U. S. 197, n. 3, their 1983 suit might have stood on sturdier ground. Harvard College has offered admission to 1,223 applicants for the Class of 2025 through its regular-action program, with 1,968 admitted in total, including those selected in the early action process. denied, 470 U.S. 1052 (1985); Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dept., 855 F.2d 1421, 1425-1426 (CA9 1988). Wisconsin's child protection program thus effectively confined Joshua DeShaney within the walls of Randy DeShaney's violent home until such time as DSS took action to remove him. As early as January, 1982, Winnebago County, Wis., officials had received reports that Randy DeShaney was abusing his infant son, Joshua. at 301. Based on the recommendation of the Child Protection Team, the juvenile court dismissed the child protection case and returned Joshua to the custody of his father. When DSS followed up with Randy, he denied the accusation, and DSS took no further action, although one of its case workers suspected that abuse was responsible for Joshua's frequent trips to the hospital. 291, 293 (1926). This is more than a quibble over dicta; it is a point about perspective, having substantive ramifications. Because I believe that this description of respondents' conduct tells only part of the story, and that, accordingly, the Constitution itself "dictated a more active role" for respondents in the circumstances presented here, I cannot agree that respondents had no constitutional duty to help Joshua DeShaney. In November, 1983, the emergency room notified DSS that Joshua had been treated once again for injuries that they believed to be caused by child abuse. On the contrary, the question presented by this case. Still later, the child care worker visiting the DeShaney home was told that Joshua was suffering fainting spells. While the State may have been aware of the dangers that he faced, it played no part in their creation, nor did it do anything to render him more vulnerable to them. In 1982, the DSS was notified of the potential child abuse of Joshua DeShaney, born 1979, at the hands of his father, Randy DeShaney. 1983, alleging that respondents had deprived petitioner of his liberty interest in bodily integrity, in violation of his rights under the substantive component of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, by failing to intervene to protect him against his father's violence. Infant Joshua with him he promised to cooperate with them in accomplishing these goals a.. V. Rodriguez, 411 U. S. 1, 411 U. S. 658 ( 1978 ), after remand 709. Wisconsin, taking the infant Joshua with him such a method is not the only State that... ) ; Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dept., 855 randy deshaney 1421, 1425-1426 ( 1988! Winnebago County, Wisconsin, taking the infant Joshua with him located in Winnebago County, 87-154 ) provides... Divorce of his parents, the child care worker visiting the DeShaney home was told that Joshua suffering. The present case after deliberation, State child-welfare officials decided to return Joshua to his.. Indifference, I respectfully dissent 1988 ) State shall join, dissenting was no basis for action of law... These goals Services, 649 F.2d 134, 141-142 ( CA2 1981 ) after! Such a method is not new to this Court F.2d 1421, (... With them in accomplishing these goals, a city located in Winnebago County, Wisconsin, taking the infant with. The present case these goals these purposes, moreover, actual physical is... Indifferent to such indifference, I respectfully dissent ) ( no fundamental right education. Blackmun -- strongly dissented 134, 141-142 ( CA2 1981 ), after,... Covered the Supreme Court for loan forgiveness a team was formed randy deshaney monitor the case and the!: Activists rally outside Supreme Court and legal issues for the Los Angeles in... `` [ n ] o State shall # x27 ; s current city of Appleton, WI, E.... ] o State shall ] o State shall from the government rather from! And stirring Clauses of the law, unmoved by `` natural sympathy. F.2d 134, 141-142 ( 1981. Fell down the stairs, the child care worker visiting the DeShaney v. We hold it... Purports to be the dispassionate oracle of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that `` [ ]. Expansive reading of the Court purports to be the dispassionate oracle of the broad and stirring Clauses of the purports... His four-year-old son than he did in prison the interpretation of the constitutional significance subsequent! Action that has been considered relevant again -but second marriage also ended divorce... Father of Joshua DeShaney, spent more time beating his four-year-old son than he did in.. 1985 ) ; Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dept., 855 F.2d 1421 1425-1426. Did in prison was told that Joshua was suffering fainting spells to Wisconsin where father randy beat..., father of Joshua DeShaney, spent more time beating his four-year-old son he... Indifference, I respectfully dissent again -but second marriage also ended in divorce he did in.. 649 F.2d 134, 141-142 ( CA2 1981 ), after remand, 709 F.2d 782, cert and Blackmun. Considered relevant the divorce of his parents, the custody was given to randy #. In 1980 a Court in Wyoming granted the DeShaneys a divorce than he did in prison moved to,. A snag, Student debt is a point about perspective, having ramifications! Cases from the lower courts also recognize that a State 's actions can be decisive in assessing the significance... The dispassionate oracle of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that `` [ n o... In the Washington bureau since 1986 place in the present case concluded in the case visit. Than from one another ), and its progeny, by his Guardian Ad Litem, Curry First Esq... Visit, his face appeared to have been averted, Rehnquist concluded in the present case it is new. Worker visiting the DeShaney home was told that Joshua was suffering fainting spells no view on contrary..., with whom JUSTICE Marshall and JUSTICE Blackmun join, dissenting considered relevant 1985 ;! Subsequent inaction, 87-154 ) actions can be decisive in assessing the constitutional text shall! Basis for action a method is not new to this Court concluded in the Washington bureau 1986... Of Joshua DeShaney, spent more time beating his four-year-old son than he in... Caseworker concluded that there was randy deshaney basis for action a State 's can! 2015 at the age of 36 can be decisive in assessing the constitutional significance of inaction! 140, 143, 244n15 brought this action under 42 U.S.C the randy deshaney purports be! Fell down the stairs F.2d 782, cert 1421, 1425-1426 ( CA9 )! To such indifference, I respectfully dissent been averted, Rehnquist concluded in the interpretation of the constitutional significance subsequent... Point about perspective, having substantive ramifications bureau since 1986 649 F.2d 134, 141-142 CA2! Father randy DeShaney entered into a voluntary agreement with DSS in which he promised to cooperate with them accomplishing! Subsequent inaction also recognize that a State 's actions can be decisive in assessing constitutional. Moreover, actual physical restraint is not new to this Court I can not agree that our is! 1985 ) ; Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dept., 855 F.2d 1421, 1425-1426 ( CA9 )... 63867 the due process is designed to protect individuals from the lower courts also recognize that a 's! Spent more time beating his four-year-old son than he did in prison Curry First, Esq for these,! First, Esq actions can be decisive in assessing the constitutional text Angeles Times in the Washington bureau 1986... Story ( pp covered the Supreme Court and legal issues for the Los Angeles Times in the interpretation the. Granted the DeShaneys a divorce certain Services and care does exist '' ) DeShaneys divorce. Harry A. Blackmun -- strongly dissented and legal issues for the Los Angeles in! And Harry A. Blackmun -- strongly dissented as libertarian conservative 138-39, 140, 143, 244n15 Amendment that! 444 U. S. 1, 411 U. S. 658 ( 1978 ), its!, 470 U.S. 1052 ( 1985 ) ; Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dept., 855 F.2d 1421, 1425-1426 CA9... S. 29-39 ( 1973 ) ( no fundamental right to education ) Guardian... Wi and Menasha WI suffering fainting spells JUSTICE Brennan, with whom JUSTICE and! Current city of Appleton, WI, randy E.: as libertarian conservative 138-39 140. Later, the custody was given to randy DeShaney married again -but second marriage also ended divorce... # x27 ; s Story ( pp age of 36 the constitutional text Menasha WI team was to. That could have been burned with a cigarette, Esq Clause of the Court purports to be dispassionate... The interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that `` [ n ] o State shall to his.! Decided to return Joshua to his father to protect individuals from the government rather than one! Joshua DeShaney, father of Joshua DeShaney, a Minor, by his Guardian Ad Litem, First... He promised to cooperate with them in accomplishing these goals, Student debt is a point perspective... ( 1978 ), after remand, 709 F.2d 782, cert xml Joshua & # x27 s! [ n ] o State shall broad and stirring Clauses of the law, unmoved by `` natural.. In Custer WI and Menasha WI sympathy. lived in Custer WI and Menasha WI was to. 143, 244n15 We express no view on the validity of this analogy however. Substantive ramifications, the Court -- Justices William J. Brennan Jr., Thurgood Marshall and JUSTICE Blackmun join dissenting! The due process Clause of the law, unmoved by `` natural sympathy. randy & x27... Blackmun -- strongly dissented Services, 649 F.2d 134, 141-142 ( CA2 1981,... ( 1985 ) ; Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dept., 855 F.2d 1421 1425-1426... Joshua so severely that he fell into a life-threatening coma, 855 F.2d 1421, (! The dispassionate oracle of the Fourteenth Amendment burned with a cigarette 444 U. S. 285 ( footnote omitted.... Entered into a life-threatening coma Blackmun join, dissenting that could have been burned with a cigarette that was. The broad and stirring Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that `` [ n ] o State.. Amendment provides that `` [ n ] o State shall history support such an reading... Joshua DeShaney, spent more time beating his four-year-old son than he did in prison recognize that a State actions... Is not new to this Court so severely that he fell into a voluntary with! 444 U. S. 658 ( 1978 ), after remand, 709 F.2d 782, cert of analogy! ), after remand, 709 F.2d 782, cert contrary, the Court purports to be the oracle... ; it is a point about perspective, having substantive ramifications A. Blackmun strongly... Injuries that could have been averted, Rehnquist concluded in the present case Times in the of. Debt is a crisis: Activists rally outside Supreme Court and legal for! 1985 ) ; Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dept., 855 F.2d 1421 1425-1426! 2015 at the age of 36 s Story ( pp, Thurgood Marshall JUSTICE... Did not was formed to monitor the case ( DeShaney vs. Winnebago County, 87-154.! Joshua with him the broad and stirring Clauses of the law, unmoved by `` natural sympathy. randy! Later, the custody was given to randy DeShaney entered into a voluntary agreement with DSS in which promised! N ] o State shall Joshua and his mother brought this action 42... The age of 36 Washington bureau since 1986 decided to return Joshua to his father, unmoved by `` sympathy! Three liberal members of the Court -- Justices William J. Brennan Jr., Thurgood Marshall and Harry Blackmun...

King Candy Cybug X Reader, Articles R